Content monetization

LinkApprove vs Skimlinks

Skimlinks automatically converts existing product mentions on a website into affiliate links with no manual work. LinkApprove requires links to be created deliberately but pays a higher share and works for creators without a website.

The short answer

Choose Skimlinks if you run a high-traffic content site with years of existing articles to monetize passively. Choose LinkApprove if you create content deliberately and want a higher revenue share on it.

Head to head

LinkApprove
Skimlinks
Model
Sub-affiliate networkAutomated link monetization
Setup
Generate links per placementOne script, fully automatic
Requires a website
NoYes

Feature by feature

LinkApprove and Skimlinks compared

LinkApproveSkimlinks
ModelSub-affiliate networkAutomated link monetization
SetupGenerate links per placementOne script, fully automatic
Requires a websiteNoYes
Revenue shareUp to 90%Roughly 75%
Works on socialYesNo
Control over placementFullAutomatic
Best content typeNew, intentional contentExisting archives
Minimum payout$100$65 equivalent

Where Skimlinks is stronger

Written without hedging, because a comparison that only flatters the author is not worth reading.

  • Genuinely zero-effort monetization of an existing archive, install once and it works
  • Excellent for large publishers with thousands of legacy articles
  • Mature, reliable infrastructure with a long operating history
  • No per-link workflow to maintain

Where LinkApprove is stronger

The specific cases where we are the better choice.

  • Higher revenue share on the commission received
  • Works for creators with no website at all
  • Full control over which products are promoted and how
  • Program-level guidance rather than blind automatic conversion

The longer answer

These are complementary rather than competing in most cases. Skimlinks monetizes what you already wrote; a sub-affiliate network monetizes what you are about to make.

Automation is Skimlinks' whole proposition and it is a strong one for a publisher with a decade of archives. The cost is control and margin: you cannot choose which advertiser a mention resolves to, and the revenue share is lower.

For a creator whose content lives on Instagram or TikTok, Skimlinks does not apply at all. There is no page for the script to run on. That is the clearest dividing line between the two.

Run both and compare the numbers

No exclusivity, no contract and no fee, so testing us against what you already use costs you nothing but a signup.